We all know that a Post-project has a defined start and an end. Sometimes, however, the end and start are not always clear. This can also help participants make better decisions and plan for the next project.
We will be looking at a neglected aspect of the software development process (SDL), the post-project review. We’ll start by explaining what a post-project review is, and then move on to discussing the elements of a successful project review.
What is a Post Project Review and what does it mean?
A project has two distinct parts: a clear start and an end. Sometimes, the end and start may not be clearly defined. Although it may not be easy to determine when a project began and ended, one can often get an idea of when it was completed. A project is anything that has a finite life span. It is possible to split up ongoing support and maintenance into clear projects. This is usually done when a software version is released and a new project is created.
An effective and powerful tool for continuous improvement is the post-project review. As mentioned, most activities can be broken down into separate projects. This continuous improvement process helps to make every succeeding project more successful and less stressful for all involved. Post-project reviews usually involve major stakeholders and the project team meeting together to review what went well and what didn’t. Participants can use this input to make better decisions and plan for the next project. This input can help to clarify misunderstandings or other issues.
See Also: To-Do List Apps for Tracking & Managing Your Tasks.
One example: During a post-project review, I found that the Quality Assurance team felt upset because they felt that changes to requirements had been approved without their input. This feedback was used to correct the situation in subsequent projects. A representative of the QA team was present at all discussions regarding requirements. They were able to raise concerns about the QA deadlines and be kept informed. All participants should understand that the post-project review is not an opportunity to assign blame or make personal attacks. It is important to praise one another on good work and to find better ways. It is important that the post-project review doesn’t become a shouting match or finger-pointing contest.
THE ELEMENTS OF a GOOD REVIEW
The project review’s primary purpose is to identify the project. Before you start planning, a post-project review will help you identify your primary goals and what you want. A post-project review is not intended to assign blame, but rather to identify opportunities for improvement and ways to improve. Before you start planning a post-project review, identify your main goals and what you want out of it.
1) Identify the items that were done well.
Sometimes, the time estimates were not accurate. Developers and quality assurance teams can work together.
2) Identify areas that could be improved:
Sometimes, the system documentation may not be ready in time. These are items that need improvement. However, it is possible to achieve some level of realistic success with some effort.
3) Identify broken items:
These are serious issues that may require a complete overhaul of how they are done. There may be some processes that need to be changed or dropped. The requirements will change constantly, which requires the team to switch to a new development methodology. There are also two people who can get on each others nerves and may need to be re-assigned so they don’t have to work together.
4) Make action plans
This is the key element that will allow you to get an agreement on or input to some action plans to improve items and fix those items that are damaged. This will allow you to make long-term changes much easier and help build team spirit and commitment.
It is important to gather as many stakeholders and team members as possible for the meeting. It may seem chaotic. but it is possible. the can be an exciting experience for everyone if it is well planned. This is important that everyone knows the goals and action plan. If everyone sees it as an opportunity to solve problems, they will be more enthusiastic. My experience is that the first review is often the most difficult because people don’t know what is permitted and what isn’t. Others may take criticisms as well. Before you go to a meeting, it is a good idea to be aware of potential explosive issues and how to diffuse them. It can be helpful to meet privately with affected parties before the meeting to make sure that ground rules are clear and get their commitment.
See Also: 10 Best Online Scheduling Tools for Web Designers
Voting is a good way to identify major issues. Each participant submits items that could fall under one of the categories. However, there are some things that need to be tweaked and fixed. Everyone feels heard and valued. It can also help you see the whole picture. It is common to find patterns in multiple issues. People should give praise for items they feel are well done. The most common issues are those that require attention. It is a good idea to get ideas from others about how to improve or fix broken items. It is possible to have an informal vote about which ideas are the best.
WHY ARE POST PROJECT REVIEWS SO IMPORTANT
The post-project reviews are important for many reasons. Here are some of them:
This is primarily to assess the effectiveness of the project, in which we realize the benefits that are as described in the economic appraisal.
Next, we need to compare the projected costs and benefits with actual costs and benefits in order to assess the overall value of the project.
Next, we can identify which aspects of the project have had a negative impact on the benefits. This can be used to make recommendations for future projects.
We can review the project and identify the potential opportunities to increase the project’s return on benefits, whether they are planned or become apparent during implementation. You can also suggest the actions that will be required to maximize their value.
HOW CAN WE CONDUCT THE POST PROJECT REVIEW ?
The following activities will be required if we are going to do a post-project review:
1) Perform a gap analysis
First, you need to look at the project. Then you will have to assess how closely the results of the project match the original goals.
2) Verify that the project’s goal has been achieved.
You now need to decide if the project’s goal has been achieved.
3) Determine the satisfaction of stakeholders
This step will determine whether stakeholders are satisfied. This step will allow you to verify that users are satisfied with the project sponsor.
4) Calculate the costs and benefits of the project:
This step will help you determine the costs and benefits of the project. You must compare the benefits to the person who is reviewing the project.
5) Identify lessons learned:
This step will help you identify the lessons learned.
CONCLUSION
Post-project reviews are a great way for teams to improve their performance and skills. It is also important to include as many stakeholders in the review as possible. This review not only helps in reviewing all aspects of the project but also allows you to clarify any misunderstandings. Review success depends on the quality of the planning and follow-up.